"As a realtor, one of my home listings sale failed in Irvington due to the Historic District. The
prospective buyer of 1730 NE Brazee St discovered during due diligence that it was unlikely he would be able
to add a dormer to the rear of the house. After learning he would not be able to make the changes he wanted
to the home, he backed out of the purchase."
Dana Griggs - Realtor
Improvements Hassle in Ladd's Addition
"In June 2007, I purchased a small house in Ladd’s Addition. My wife and were excited to renovate our new home,
hired an architect, and began what we thought should be a four month renovation. Much to our surprise,
the Historic Design Review extended eight months and required three separate plan revisions by two s
eparate architects in a futile effort to appease the City of Portland and the neighbors. Both the
City of Portland and the neighbors demanded we make the non-contributing structure appear historic.
We spent well over $30,000 during this process including the Design Review fees, architect fees, and
the mortgage for the unoccupied home. The worst part of the process was dealing with our neighbors,
who mischaracterized the remodel of the home as a “massive expansion of a non-contributing structure” when
we were trying to add approximately 500 square feet to a 1,580 square foot non-conforming house.
One of the neighbors even demanded that we present our plans to him so that he could “provide input
on the proposed design and materials, rather than doing this through the Landmarks Review.” Ultimately we
abandoned our plans, leaving the house its original size and focusing our energy on the interior improvements.
It wasn’t the warmest welcome to the neighborhood. Thankfully we have meet many wonderful people in the
neighborhood since we moved into our home in November, 2008."
Ben Henzel - Ladd's Home Owner
Property Tax Increase
"My home is on the Historic Register and I participated in the tax abatement program 19 years ago. However,
when my home came to the end of the 15 year tax abatement, it was revalued and I pay substantially more
property tax than if I would have not gone the Historic Register. The tax savings over the 15 year period
have virtually been wiped out in last 4 years and I pay double the property tax compared to my neighbors. If
I would have NOT participated in the program, I would have been protected by the 3% max yearly increase."
Rob Lloyd - Buckman Home Owner
Craftsman Porch on a Craftsman House
This story should serve as a concrete example of what people should expect if they elect to establish a
historic district. I bought a house in Irvington last year without having any idea of there being a historic
district. The house, a 1911 craftsman, has a stoop but no porch, which was something we were looking for. My
wife and I decided that we would build a porch, which would essentially be an extension of the stoop to the
sides. We discussed it with a contractor, who brought our attention to the historic district rules. Don't
be fooled by those who will tell you that a National Register of Historic Places listing is only honorary
and doesn't carry any real regulations with it. That is true only in the narrowest sense. There are no
federal regulations that come with the listing. However, as soon as a neighborhood is listed, Oregon state
and Portland local laws become applicable immediately. I became familiar with those rules as listed in the
Portland city code. The language is opaque so I called the city for clarification. I ended up speaking with
David Skilton, who is in charge of historic reviews for the city. I told him what I hoped to do, which was
to build a porch that was in keeping with the style of the house and character of the neighborhood. This is
exactly what he said to me: "Did the house originally have a porch?" I answered no. He said, "Well I can't
see how we can approve that then." I responded along the lines of "Wasn't the whole point to preserve the
character of the neighborhood" and so on. He essentially said no, it was about preserving the structures as
they are. So don't believe it when the preservationists give you some line like "the neighborhood is the
historic resource and we aren't concerned about the individual structures." That is absolutely not true.
Furthermore, if you decide to try your luck and get a project approved, it will cost you dearly. To get
approval to change even a single window is a minimum of nearly ~$1000, and it gets much higher for larger
projects. And that is just to ask permission. They'll still say no and keep your money. We haven't even
bothered to submit our proposal- why waste our money.
Don't be fooled by the preservationists, they essentially want to control what you can do with your house and not compensate you one bit for your loss of control over your own property. The whole tax break thing only helps you if you buy a run down structure that you are going to restore. And the whole thing about increased property values doesn't hold up on analysis. Historic districts have tended to get established in gentrifying areas where values were increasing anyway.
Jeffrey La Rochelle - Irvington Home Owner
Uncertainty, Time and Cost
"We just went through Irvington Historical Design review this summer. It's important to note
that it's not just a problem of fees, the statutory requirements also impose significant project
delay (minimum 6 weeks, up to 8) or longer if there is an appeal; which the neighborhood association
gets to file at no cost whereas it is additional cost if the homeowner requests. To me, this creates
an unnecessary element of uncertainty in the mind of a homeowner wishing to make an improvement. As
your article suggests the whole process currently serves as a disincentive in terms of encouraging small
improvements which is all that a lot of residents can afford. The fees are in addition to the standard BDS
permit costs so it's a double whammy in terms of encouraging non-permited work."
Tony Jones comment on Portland Architecture blog post
"Ask Irvington residents how this all worked out for them... After much acrimony by any who
understood all the ramifications...we are now to understand that it is simply that the fees associated
with historic design review are too high. That is certainly true. But the greater loss is in the new
restrictions against improvements not in keeping with the aesthetics of the Irvingtonians in charge.
Want to put up solar panels? Good luck. Want to put up a satellite dish? Better be NO part viewable
from the street. Want a new door...new windows...better start saving up because there will be few options."
"HoloceneMan" comment on Oregonian article